Review





Similar Products

rotarod treadmill  (Med Associates Inc)
96
Med Associates Inc rotarod treadmill
Rotarod Treadmill, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pmc13099944-117-1-3?v=Med+Associates+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rotarod treadmill - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rods  (Thorlabs)
86
Thorlabs rods
Rods, supplied by Thorlabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pmc12951291-4-3-11?v=Thorlabs
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rods - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rod  (Muromachi Kikai)
86
Muromachi Kikai rod
Rod, supplied by Muromachi Kikai, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pm42310452-674-7-10?v=Muromachi+Kikai
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
domino rod connectors  (Zimmer Biomet)
86
Zimmer Biomet domino rod connectors
Domino Rod Connectors, supplied by Zimmer Biomet, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/us12653581-21-7-20?v=Zimmer+Biomet
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
domino rod connectors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
colloidal quantum rod nanocrystals  (Photonics Inc)
86
Photonics Inc colloidal quantum rod nanocrystals
Colloidal Quantum Rod Nanocrystals, supplied by Photonics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pm42296044-205-38-0?v=Photonics+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
colloidal quantum rod nanocrystals - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
metal rods  (Coulbourn Instruments)
86
Coulbourn Instruments metal rods
Metal Rods, supplied by Coulbourn Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pm42243099-311-5-8?v=Coulbourn+Instruments
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
metal rods - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
steel rods  (Muromachi Kikai)
86
Muromachi Kikai steel rods
Steel Rods, supplied by Muromachi Kikai, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pm42276330-120-32-40?v=Muromachi+Kikai
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
steel rods - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
five lane mouse rotarod  (Med Associates Inc)
96
Med Associates Inc five lane mouse rotarod
Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
Five Lane Mouse Rotarod, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pmc13122704-439-14-18?v=Med+Associates+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
five lane mouse rotarod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rota-rod  (Med Associates Inc)
96
Med Associates Inc rota-rod
Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
Rota Rod, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/med+associates+inc___locomotor-activity?v=Med+Associates+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rota-rod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ambient light  (Med Associates Inc)
96
Med Associates Inc ambient light
Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
Ambient Light, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rod/pmc13122704-439-8-18?v=Med+Associates+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ambient light - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual rotarod trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).

Journal: iScience

Article Title: The GPCR Smoothened on cholinergic interneurons modulates dopamine-associated acetylcholine dynamics, learning, and effort management

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115324

Figure Lengend Snippet: Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual rotarod trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).

Article Snippet: Trials were conducted in a room with low ambient light and noise using a five-lane mouse rotarod (ENV-574M; Med Associates) programmed to accelerate linearly from 4 to 40 RPM over 300 seconds (preset speed setting #9).

Techniques: Control, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test, Comparison